• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Report: Chinese army tied to widespread US hacking
  • Recommended: Chinese official booted after account of lurid affair emerges
  • Recommended: In debt or jobless, many Italians choose suicide
  • Recommended: Carnival-like atmosphere in Myanmar ahead of election

World Blog provides a dynamic look at world events and trends from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 29
    Mar
    2012
    12:05pm, EDT

    For Palestinian farmer, a constant reminder of Israeli occupation

    Paul Goldman / NBC News

    Abu Nidal, 70, stands on his land in the Palestinian village of Al-Walaja. Construction of the Israeli security barrier can be seen in the background.

    By Paul Goldman , NBC News

    AL-WALAJA, West Bank –  Palestinian activists are calling for a “Global March to Jerusalem” this Friday to mark Land Day, an annual event that commemorates the killing of six Arabs who were protesting the Israeli practice of expropriating Arab land to build Jewish settlements on March 30, 1976.

    Since then Palestinians have commemorated March 30 as Land Day and have turned it into a general day of protest against what they see as discriminatory practices by the Israeli government.

    But 70-year-old Abu Nidal doesn’t need a special calendar day to remind him of the Israeli occupation and their confiscation of his land. Nidal just needs to wake up every morning and look outside his window to see how the Israelis are confiscating his land.


     He lives in the village Al Walaja, nestled in the hills between Jerusalem and Bethlehem. Half of the village of just over 2,000 is considered to be part of Jerusalem and the other half is part of the West Bank. So now the Israeli security wall snakes through the village.

    “Land Day is like a music record being played over and over,” he said. “I live out of despair with no future in sight, I see no light only darkness.”

    'Global March to Jerusalem': Israel's borders on high alert as huge protests loom

    When the Israelis sent huge yellow bulldozers to the village in 2010 to start working on the separation wall, no one bothered to check on whether or not the wall ran through Nidal’s farm land – which it does. And it has not only been 86 olive trees that were up rooted by the approximately 26-foot high concrete barrier, but also Nidal’s family graveyard.

    Paul Goldman / NBC News

    Parts of the Israeli security wall are still under construction, while others are already snaking through the West Bank village Al-Walaja.

    It was his grandmother’s wish that every family member be buried on their 11-acre farm land. But the Israelis have a different plan for the confiscated land. They are planning to build not only the wall, but a recreational park for Israelis on the other side of the wall.
    As it stands now, Nidal can only look at his mother and grandmother’s graves from a distance with the dreadful knowledge that soon the wall will be his only view.

    “It’s not only a question of land confiscation, but also of making our life so miserable that we will have to pack up our lives and leave,” Nidal said. “But, of course, I want to be buried alongside my mother.”

    This Friday when demonstrators take to the streets commemorating Land Day, Nidal won’t join them; his battle is being waged in the Israeli courts. But he pointed out that his case doesn’t have much of a shot. “The court is Israeli, the judge is Israeli and the lawyers are Israelis.  It’s a losing battle.”

    Nidal’s story is just one out of many. There are approximately 2,300 Palestinians living in the village of Al Walaja and everyone I talked to had a similarly desperate story. The common theme to all the stories is the feeling they live in a prison surrounded by a wall and Jewish settlements.
     

     

     

    211 comments

    It's a shame that the Arabs didn't want to cooperate in 1948. Instead of peaceful negotiations, the Arabs decided to wage a war of extermination against the Jews in Israel.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, featured, separation-wall, paul-goldman, land-day
  • 29
    Mar
    2012
    4:40am, EDT

    'Global March to Jerusalem': Israel's borders on high alert as huge protests loom

    Menahem Kahana / AFP - Getty Images

    Palestinian schoolgirls walk past Israeli border policemen standing guard outside a Palestinian house in the center of Hebron in the occupied West Bank on Thursday after dozens of Jewish settlers took over the Palestinian property overnight, claiming they have legal ownership.

     

    By Lawahez Jabari, NBC News Producer

    RAMALLAH, West Bank – Palestinian organizers are calling for massive demonstrations on Friday to mark Land Day, an annual event that commemorates the killing of six Arabs who were protesting Israeli land policies on March 30, 1976.

    Tens of thousands are expected to participate in what organizers have billed a "Global March to Jerusalem." The plan is to have protesters from neighboring countries march up to the Israeli border to "demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians and to protect Jerusalem," according to organizers.

    The future status of Jerusalem is at the heart of the Palestinian movement and is the theme for the global Land Day. East Jerusalem is regarded as the likely capital of a future Palestinian state.



    Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, a Palestinian activist, explained some of the reasoning for the march to NBC News during a recent interview in Ramallah. 

    "In light of the total failure of the peace talks, and given the Israeli destruction of the last potential two-state solution through settlement activities, we realize nothing will change unless we change the balance of power," said Barghouti.  He added that organizers are trying to achieve that through this "non-violent peaceful resistance."

    For Palestinian farmer, a constant reminder of Israeli occupation

    For many Palestinians, Land Day is an annual opportunity to demonstrate that Palestinians inside Israel, the West Bank and Gaza are united and share common goals. 

    This year will mark 36 years since Israel’s practice of expropriating Arab land to build Jewish settlements provoked protests by Arab residents in the Galilee and Negev. In addition to the six people who were killed, over 100 wounded during the ensuing violence. Since then Palestinians have commemorated March 30 as Land Day and have turned the day into a general protest against what they see as discriminatory practices by the Israeli government. So it seemed an appropriate date for activists to hold their march. 

    Menahem Kahana / AFP - Getty Images

    An Israeli settler looks out the window of an occupied Palestinian house as an Israeli soldier stands guard in the center of Hebron in the occupied West Bank on March 29, 2012. Dozens of Jewish settlers took over the Palestinian property overnight, claiming they have legal ownership.

    "The Global March to Jerusalem represents three things," said Barghouti. "First of all, the unity of the Palestinian people, and their struggle to achieve freedom and end occupation, for Palestinians in and out of Palestine; second, it affirms the centrality of the issues of land and Jerusalem to achieving Palestinian freedom; and third, it provides international solidarity with the Palestinian cause."

    'Absolutely peaceful'
    The organizers plan to send convoys of vehicles to approach Israel's borders simultaneously from four neighboring countries: Jordan, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. According to organizers, more than 600 institutions from 64 states have been involved in planning the march. Protests are also planned outside Israeli embassies in Europe and Arab countries. Organizers say they are hoping for 1 million people to demonstrate in various protests all over the world.

    "The event is meant to be a non-violent protest that will include parliament members, citizens and religious figures from all over the world – including Jews, Israelis will also protest with us," Saied Yaqin, one of the march organizers, told NBC News.

    Organizers of the march insist the protests will be orderly.

    "This march is absolutely peaceful and non-violent, and we will try everything possible to prevent violence," Barghouti said. "Of course, if they use violence against us, the world should protest. But the march is absolutely peaceful and nobody will try to provoke violence."

    But Israeli Defense Forces aren’t taking any chances.

    A statement released by the IDF said they are "prepared for any eventuality and will do whatever is necessary to protect Israeli borders and residents."

    Israel has also issued a stern warning to Arab countries and Palestinians to refrain from approaching the border.

    Soldiers along the border have been instructed to be on high alert and they will reportedly have crowd-dispersal means at the ready and will also deploy marksmen. According to a Haaretz report, a so-called "skunk" device is being prepared that sprays a harsh-smelling substance at demonstrators. 

     

     

    More from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • 'Global March to Jerusalem': Israel's borders on high alert as protests loom
    • Gang-raped, strangled, set on fire: Teen dies in Ukraine hospital
    • Was Jewish school gunman linked to French spies?
    • Global smartphone booms poses huge fraud risk, expert says 
    • US: North Korea using hackers; food aid suspended over rocket
    • US orders more security for troops in Afghanistan

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

    615 comments

    The Jews want peace, and have wanted peace for 2000 years.We lived unarmed in ghettoes created by your forefathers in Europe for all thattime and were slaughtered, raped, and oppressed. It was better in Muslim lands-but not by much. There were still pogroms and we were at best second classcitizens.  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, jerusalem, featured, lawahez-jabari, land-day
  • 23
    Dec
    2011
    12:23pm, EST

    Hoop dreams bring young Israelis, Palestinians together

    Paul Goldman / NBC News

    Children shoot hoops in Jerusalem as part of the PeacePlayers International program.

    By Paul Goldman, NBC News

    JERUSALEM -- "Shlomi, throw me the ball."

    "Assi, it's your turn, pass and dribble."

    "Mahmud, great pass. What a basket."

    This might sound like a normal basketball game but it's not. The unique endeavor can be best described as an "oasis of coexistence" in Israel where Jews, Muslims and Christians play not only on the same court but in mixed teams.


    In 2001, American brothers Sean and Brendan Tuohey founded PeacePlayers International with the premise that children who play together can learn to live together.

    It seemed quite obvious during my visit to practice that the Tuohey brothers were succeeding. Here on the court at the "Hand in Hand" bilingual school in Jerusalem, Israelis and Palestinians were laughing together, hugging each other and, most importantly, shooting the ball together.

    "At first the kids and their parents were hesitant with some kids even crying," says Karen Doubilet, who is the PeacePlayers International's Middle East managing director. "But the transition is very fast, now they jump in joy and hug each other when they meet on and off the court."

    'They are like me'
    After experiencing so much hatred between Israelis and Palestinians, it was refreshing and exciting to see how naturally these kids reacted and played with each other.

    Malak Ayub, 12, is a Muslim girl from the East Jerusalem village of Shoafat.

    "Before I came to this program I thought Israelis only wanted to do bad things to us but now I see that they are like me, they want to play together," she said.

    One of Malak's best friends is Hadas Prawer, a 14-year-old Israeli from the neighborhood of Mevaseret, which is located west of Jerusalem. I asked Hadas what she tells her friends when they hear she plays with Palestinians.

    "I don't care what people think or say, I'm having fun and that's it," she said, before turning around and giving Malak a huge hug.

    The traditional Hanukkah 'Sufganiyot' -- the Jewish ball-shaped doughnuts -- were waiting on the sidelines as a reward for the kids' hard work. All the children were wearing T-shirts with the US AID logo on the back, indicating the backing by the US.

    "Basketball is huge, especially with the girls," Doubilet added. "Most of these kids don’t have a constructive framework and we give them this activity almost for free. The relationships here will no doubt shape the way Israelis and Palestinians think of each other in the future".

    About 550 young people aged from six to 18 enrolled in this program in the past year, bridging communities in Israel like Jaffa, Tamra and Jerusalem where Jews and Muslims live next to each other. 

    Haled Sabah is a 20-year-old Palestinian from Shoafat. He joined the program seven years ago and is now one of its coaches.

    "I see some racism on both sides but when kids play on the same team they just see each other simply as people," he said. 

    78 comments

    Peace is obtainable

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, basketball, jerusalem, featured, paul-goldman, peaceplayers-international
  • 22
    Sep
    2011
    1:12pm, EDT

    Sharing blood - between Israelis and Palestinians

    Palestinian Wajee Tameise and Israeli Mashka Litvak donate blood together as part of the "Blood Relations" project.

    By Paul Goldman, NBC News Producer

    TEL AVIV – The grief and sorrow on both sides of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is torturous. Families from both sides have been left to mourn their lost loved ones after years of armed conflict. Young kids that died on the West Bank streets fighting Israeli soldiers and young Israeli kids that boarded a deadly bus not knowing a suicide bomber was sitting next to them.

    It is natural for family members of victims to feel a mix of incredible emotions: anger, grief and a desire for revenge. 

    Out of all those emotions one amazing organization was born: The Parents Circle Family Forum. Its members all had immediate family killed in the conflict.  But instead of hanging on to hatred and revenge, they have all worked to spearhead a reconciliation process between Israelis and Palestinians.



    “We are unfortunately witnessing an acceleration process of dehumanization,” said Dr. Aliva Savir, a member of the Parents Circle Family forum. “There is an urgent need to stress the human dimension of this conflict.”

    This week, while leaders from both sides are at the United Nations and the world is focused on the Palestinians bid for statehood, more blood was exchanged on the streets of Israel.  But this time the blood was given willingly through intravenous tubes.

    The family forum organized the “Blood Relations” project during which about 50 Israelis and Palestinian who had lost loved ones in the conflict donated blood.

    Palestinian Wajee Tameise and Israeli Mashka Litvak sat next to each other while they made their donations. Tameise lost his brother to the conflict in 1991. Litvak also lost her brother, Arnon Litvak, who died during an army battle in 1970 and her father, Moshe Litvak, who was killed during the 1947 war for independence.

    Their blood donations will be shared by both Israeli and Palestinian hospitals with the message "Will you hurt someone who has your blood running through their veins?"

    “We want to be part of any future political agreement,” said Ali Abu Awwad, one of the project’s managers. “There is a need for an ongoing dialog towards peace, whatever the result of the Palestinian quest for an independent state is.” 
     

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: un, palestinians, israelis, blood-drive, paul-goldman
  • 16
    Sep
    2011
    6:00pm, EDT

    Palestinians face US counteroffensive on UN vote

    President Mahmoud Abbas said he would demand full membership of the United Nations for a Palestinian state when he goes to the U.N. General Assembly next week, setting up a diplomatic clash with Israel and the United States. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

    By Andrea Mitchell and Catherine Chomiak, NBC News

    U.S  officials are working feverishly to persuade the Palestinians to back down from what is still only a threat to go to the United Nations Security Council with their demand for immediate statehood.

    On Friday, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said he will request full membership at the United Nations when the General Assembly convenes next week.

    One official told NBC News after Abbas's announcement that "this is a negotiation. They say they are doing it until they say they aren't doing it."

    The U.S. has been resolute in its opposition to the proposed action and is engaged in frantic last-minute diplomatic discussions to try to head it off.


    Just Thursday, Secretary Clinton reaffirmed the administration’s view, saying, "we believe strongly that the road to peace and two states living side-by-side does not go through New York. It goes through Jerusalem and Ramallah and it is our absolute conviction that we need to get the parties back to the negotiating table."

    Clinton also recently dispatched two top Middle East diplomats to the region. U.S. envoys David Hale and Dennis Ross have met with Israeli President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak. On the Palestinian side, they have met with Abbas and others.

    History or histrionics in UN’s Palestine vote?

     According to an official, the diplomats are offering alternatives to UN action, including a fast track to new talks between the two sides and further pressure on Israel to stop its settlements policy. 

    Their efforts may be paying off, as the Palestinian Authority has not yet taken the first procedural step needed to introduce a statehood resolution to the Security Council. 

    Israelis and Palestinians discuss their views on the Palestinians push for statehood at the U.N.

    The Palestinians would have to first send a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon requesting that a resolution be brought to the Security Council. Ban in turn would write to the Security Council. A member of the council would then have to bring it up on behalf of the Palestinians. A resolution would then have to be drafted, debated and amended before it could be brought to a vote.

    The United States has said that it would veto such a resolution if it passes in the Security Council.  In order for a resolution to pass it must have nine votes of the council’s 15 members. If the resolution were to get nine votes, the U.S. or another of the five permanent members could exercise veto power.

    If the Palestinians either do not or cannot get the Security Council to vote on their resolution, they would seek the same status from the 193-member United Nations General Assembly. They will have overwhelming support in that body, and that would give them important leverage.

    However, the U.S. position remains that UN action will not bring about a two-state solution with both sides living in peace and security. “We all know that no matter what happens or doesn’t happen at the UN, the next day is not going to result in the kind of changes that the United States wishes to see,” Clinton said.

    Andrea Mitchell is NBC News' chief foreign affairs correspondent. Catherine Chomiak is NBC News' State Department producer.

    Palestinian UN vote: What is it? Why now?

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, un-vote
  • 16
    Sep
    2011
    2:08pm, EDT

    History or histrionics in U.N.'s Palestine vote?

    Nasser Shiyoukhi / AP

    A Palestinian holding a national flag climbs the separation barrier during a protest against its construction in the West Bank village of Walajeh, outside Jerusalem, on Friday.

    ANALYSIS

    By John Ray, NBC News  

    TEL AVIV, Israel – In this overheated part of the world, it is often difficult to tell the difference between history and histrionics.

    How much is really revolutionary, and how much is merely rhetoric, words that will run into the sands?

    For instance, no one can yet tell how the uprisings in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya will work out. Meet the new bosses, same as the old bosses? Or a genuinely fresh start?

    It’s the same with the Palestinian Authority’s decision to seek a United Nations-approved declaration of statehood.

    Is this a moment of truth, or just as likely, another weary milestone on a seemingly never-ending road to some kind of final settlement with Israel?

    Hope vs. reality
    That’s certainly the experience of Palestinian Attalah Tamimi. His face lined by the sun and his crew cut hair gray, he has witnessed many false dawns.

    On his wall, there is a photograph of a younger Tamimi as a prisoner in an Israeli jail. And there is another, in the uniform of Palestinian security forces.

    The years of fighting followed by peaceful protest and two decades of fruitless negotiations have not won back the land he says has been stolen by Israel.

    From a hilltop close to his West Bank home in the village of Nabi Saleh, Tamimi pointed across the valley to the red tiled roofs of a Jewish settlement.

    “They have built a swimming pool and a theater over my olive trees. We cannot even go to the well to draw water. The Jews say it’s a holy spring,” he said to  me.

    So now the United Nations beckons. And Tamimi, like many Palestinians, is caught between hope and reality.

    “In some ways it’s as important as 1988 when Yasser Arafat declared our Palestinian state. It is saying we are a nation, but we have never, ever had control of our land,” he said.

    “Now I want the United Nations to show that the world is with us. But I know we can never win until the Americans stop supporting Israel.’’

    Israelis and Palestinians discuss their views on the Palestinians push for statehood at the U.N.

    Showdown at the U.N.
    With both Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu scheduled to address the U.N. General Assembly next Friday, Sept. 23, it looks as if it will be a day of dramatic diplomacy.

    But it will likely be a day which in itself decides nothing.

    That’s because if a vote to recognize Palestine eventually goes to the Security Council, the U.S., one of five veto-wielding members, will likely veto it. It would be a mistake, some suggest, delivering another blow to America’s reputation in the Arab world as it backs Israel, its closest ally in the region.

    Meanwhile, at the General Assembly, which consists of all member states, the Palestinians probably already have enough supporters to win some form of enhanced status, short of nationhood.

    Senior Palestinian officials tell me if nothing else, this will raise the morale of their people. It will at the very least shake the dice, they say.

    The problem comes for the Palestinian leadership if it does no more than that – if hopes and expectations are raised, but the checkpoints, Israeli troops and settlers remain in place.

    Familiar battle for Israel
    From an Israeli point of view, it all ties together in a familiar narrative. A Jewish David against their Arab Goliath. A battle they have fought every day since the Jewish State was founded in 1948.

    Here’s what Netanyahu had to say about his mission to New York during a press conference on Thursday:

    “Now I know that the General Assembly is not a place where Israel gets a fair hearing. I know that the automatic majorities there always rush to condemn Israel and twist truth beyond recognition.  But I’ve decided to go there anyway – not to win applause, but to speak the truth to every nation that wants to hear the truth.’’

    Echoing U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Israelis say the path to peace runs through negotiations in Jerusalem, not confrontation in New York.

    That said, it might have helped the Israeli case if their government had come up with some kind of plausible plan over the past year. Instead, they have been painted by the rest of the world as the foot-dragging intransigents; refusing, for example, President Barack Obama’s demands to halt settlements.

    Chilly neighborhood for Israel
    And now, after the Arab Spring, the diplomatic weather has turned chillier still.

    Israel has fallen out with its one-time friend, Turkey, a rising power in the Muslim world whose Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is touring Arab Spring states and winning friends on the Arab street with an anti-Israeli zeal matched only by his enthusiasm for the Palestinian cause.

    “It's time to raise the Palestinian flag at the United Nations,”  Erdogan declared to an enthusiastic audience in Cairo. “Let's raise the Palestinian flag and let that flag be the symbol of peace and justice in the Middle East.”

    Egpyt, with a treaty dating back to 1979, is Israel’s most powerful neighbor and therefore its most important Arab partner in peace.

    But now, there are many in the maelstrom of forces unleashed by the uprising who are demanding that the treaty get torn up. Some of them even ransacked the Israeli Embassy in Cairo a week ago.

    The Israeli response has been unusually muted and measured. Why? Because this is the axis that Israel sees as truly vital to its security.

    History is at stake  –  let’s not wreck it with histrionics, you know they’re reasoning.

    Related link: Palestinian vote: What is it? Why now?

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, featured, john-ray, un-vote
  • 16
    Sep
    2011
    10:42am, EDT

    Taking the pulse on the streets of Tel Aviv and Ramallah

    Israelis and Palestinians discuss their views on the Palestinian push for statehood at the U.N.

    Palestinians are planning to make a push for recognition as an independent state at the United Nations next week.

    While Israelis and Palestinians are divided on the subject, there is some nuances in their opinions. NBC's Paul Goldman and Lawahez Jabari took to the street in Tel Aviv and Ramallah, respectively, to check the pulse of both Jews and Arabs on the looming U.N. vote.

    "For Israel it’s a good thing because I think we should separate ourselves and having there own country will eventually mean less trouble for us," said Yoav Glazer in Tel Aviv.

    But Gabi Halevi felt that the Palestinians push for recognition should be done in a differently. "They should negotiate with Israel secretly, in a discreet way, not through the rule of the U.N. I don’t think this will be good for them."

    Click on the video above to hear more opinions on the UN vote.


    "If we become a state recognized by other countries then we will have a better way of fighting for our rights," said Ali Shuker in Ramallah.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: palestinians, israelis, paul-goldman, lawahez-jabari, un-vote
  • 15
    Sep
    2011
    5:20pm, EDT

    Palestinian UN vote: What is it? Why now?

     

    Marco Longari / AFP - Getty Images

    Palestinians take part in an anti-US demonstration in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Thursday. Dozens of Palestinians chanted slogans against the pressure by the US government on the Palestinian Authority to convince them to step down from the UN bid for membership state.

    By Yara Borgal, NBC News

    RAMALLAH, West Bank – The dusty miles of hillsides and olive groves, Arab villages, Jewish settlements and Israeli military checkpoints that make up the West Bank of the River Jordan are a world removed from the Vatican City. But one of the oddities of the Palestinians' latest efforts to build their own state is that the two might well end up on an equal diplomatic footing.

    One likely outcome of the Palestinian plan to take their case to the United Nations next week would see them elevated to the status of  “non-member observer’’ – the same status held by the pope’s city state.

    If they are lucky, it might be the best thing the Palestinians can achieve. 


    Seeking a different status
    Currently the Palestine Liberation Organization holds only “observer entity status” in the U.N.  If that status were to change to a full member, Palestinians would gain full voting rights at the U.N.

    However, in order for the General Assembly to admit Palestine as a full member state, U.N. Security Council approval is needed. The U.S., which opposes the Palestinian request, has veto power and the State Department has made it clear the U.S. will use it.

    “Washington has unfortunately declared that it’s going to veto our request,” said Dr. Mohammad Shtayyeh, a senior Palestinian official and an adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

    “We will try again. Israel was vetoed twice, Jordan was rejected more than once, Portugal was rejected five times, Japan was rejected six times and so on.  History has taught us that this issue is not a one shot; it’s a process.”

    Option B
    Another option for the Palestinian Authority is to by-pass the Security Council and the U.S. veto and take its statehood request directly to the General Assembly, where approval requires a two-thirds majority vote –129 out of 193 member countries.

    According to Palestinian officials, 122 countries have already recognized Palestine, but they hope to gain the support of up to 150.

    If the General Assembly approves the request, it would grant only limited U.N. recognition as a non-member observer state – so Palestinians would not have the right to vote.

    However, it would allow the Palestinians to join dozens of U.N. bodies and conventions, including the International Criminal Court. That would give Palestinians the opportunity to file charges against Israel for alleged violations of international law – such as the continued settlement building.

    ‘A different mechanism’
    The Palestinians have long aspired to establish an independent, sovereign state within the 1967 borders.

    However, frustration from decades of on-and-off peace talks that have failed to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has led the Palestinians, represented by the Palestinian Authority, to pursue new strategies.

    Shtayyeh pointed out that it has been 18 years since the Oslo Accords, which were supposed to set the stage for a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. “Unfortunately, almost two decades later, the Israeli occupation of Palestine is entrenched and Israel’s occupation has turned into de facto annexation,” he said.

    “All that we are looking for is a new mechanism to end the conflict.  We are not going into violence, we are not going into armed struggle, we are not taking any unilateral steps. We are going to a multilateral forum that has 193 countries and we are asking this international community to speak loudly for a two state solution,” said Shtayyeh.

    He added that the move isn’t meant as a challenge to America.

    “We are saying to Washington and to the international community these peace talks have been ongoing for 20 years and they have not achieved their goal,” said Shtayyeh. “The goal is the same; we just simply need a different approach, a different mechanism.”

    The Palestinians also argue that their U.N. plan fits with the deadline set by the Middle East Peace Quartet –  the E.U., U.S., Russia and U.N. – to reach a two-state solution by September 2011.

    “Even President Obama was hoping to see Palestine admitted to the United Nations in his speech last September to the General Assembly, so everybody wants this to happen,” said Shtayyeh.

    Strong opposition from Israel
    Israel has made it clear that if the Palestinian request is passed, it will not change anything on the ground. The checkpoints, separation wall and settlements will still all be there. The creation of a Palestinian state on the basis of 1967 borders is something, they say, no Israeli government will accept because it threatens Israel’s security.

    However, the Israelis view this step as far from being a meaningless gesture. They worry about the legality of their occupation and the settlements in the West Bank being put to the judgment of the International Criminal Court. In theory, it might lead to Israeli officials being dragged repeatedly before the International Criminal Court at the Hague – something they obviously don’t want.

    The Israeli government, like the U.S., believes U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state will set back the peace process. Peace, they insist, can only be achieved through talks.

    Israel and the U.S. have urged the Palestinians to reconsider going to the U.N., warning of dire consequences.

    Some Israeli right wing officials have called for the suspensions of the transfer of tax revenues to the Palestinian Authority, the cancellation of all previous agreements and the annexation of territory containing settlement blocs in the West Bank to the state of Israel.

    The United States has threatened to stop all financial aid to the Palestinian Authority if they proceed with plans to ask the U.N. for recognition of an independent state.

    Realizing what’s at stake, the Palestinians have stated that they still intend to submit an application for recognition of Palestinian statehood to the Security Council as a first step.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: us, israel, palestinians, featured, un-vote, yara-borgal
  • 9
    Sep
    2011
    12:52pm, EDT

    Palestinians ready to move past 9/11 to UN vote

    By Lawahez Jabari, NBC News Producer

    RAMALLAH, West Bank – Ten years since the shattering events of 9/11 changed the world, many Palestinians remain focused on what is unchanged: their dream of a sovereign state alongside Israel is still just a dream.

    Many believe the last decade was actually a huge setback for their cause – especially because of America's subsequent war on terror.

    “I think 9/11 was a turning point for Muslims and Arabs all over the world,” said Palestinian journalist Malak Hasan. “Since then the West is more compassionate with the Israelis than with the Palestinians. They think that we are only terrorists and deserve what is happening to us.”

    Many here say that sense of prejudice has built barriers between the Arab and Western world and has created suspicions and misconceptions on both sides.


    Shadi Issa holds both U.S. and Palestinian passports, but said he still has difficulty traveling. 

    “It's very bad. We cannot travel freely,” he said. “When I travel anywhere in the world I feel that people are looking at me. They ask me questions like, ‘Where are you from? Why are you here?’ Even if I'm going on vacation,” Issa added.

    Nahed Freij is a business consultant and another frequent traveler. When asked if she gets the same treatment and how she feels about it, she replied matter of factly: “It’s discrimination.”

    Still ten years on, there is no lack of compassion for those who died on 9/11. “We were all victims, because when people die, everyone is a victim,” said Rasha Sansur, among the crowds shopping in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

    But ask around and you're also likely to hear Palestinians give credence to the many conspiracy theories that surround 9/11.

    “The Mossad knew about it and the CIA knew about it. There were 3,000 Jews in the building who didn't go to work that day, it was not a random thing. Someone told them,'' Ashraf Abu Iram was quick to say during a conversation in the middle of a busy street in
    Ramallah.

    Still, Palestinians this month are focused on New York, not as much on the commemorations for 9/11 as to events a few blocks away.
    At the United Nations headquarters on Sept. 20, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is scheduled to ask the General Assembly to recognize an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders. 

    “Lately we are focusing on our state, we are thinking about the vote in the U.N., it is the most important thing for us now,” said 23-year-old Sama Anfus.

    But the fact that the United States has vowed to veto the move only confirms in most Palestinian minds that the legacy of 9/11 in this part of the Middle East is one of division and discord.  

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: un, palestinians, 9-11, sept-11-attacks, lawahez-jabari
  • 4
    May
    2011
    5:32pm, EDT

    Palestinian factions strike deal, but still need to agree on message

    Adel Hana / AP

    Palestinians ride motorcycles while waving yellow Fatah and green Hamas flags along the streets during a rally celebrating the signing of a reconciliation agreement between Fatah and Hamas, in Gaza city, Wednesday.

    By Martin Fletcher, NBC News Correspondent

    On paper, it sounds marvelous; but peace in our time, it isn't. Peace, that is, among the Palestinians.
     
    To agree to a unity deal between his Fatah movement and rival Hamas, West Bank leader and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas wanted the two factions to combine their security services into one. A state, Abbas says, can't have two militaries, each loyal to a different master. But Hamas refused and the compromise is that each Palestinian party will have its own security services.

    In other words, while agreeing to unite after nearly five years of bitter conflict, including an all-out war in Gaza in May 2007, each side remains prepared for the day after.

    But with the Palestinian Authority building the institutions of a state, and collecting guarantees from dozens of countries that they will support the Palestinian application for independence and a full seat in the United Nations in September, it is imperative that Palestinians are united. Or at least, appear so.

    After all, Israel's argument against a Palestinian state, for now, has been that the Palestinians are so divided that they can't claim to be a responsible member of the family of nations.

    The agreement between Fatah and Hamas scuppers that objection.


    So now Israel has raised another objection. They say Hamas is a terrorist organization, recognized as such by Europe and the United States, is sworn to Israel's destruction, and so cannot be part of a legitimate national government. And if it is, that government should not be recognized.

    It’s either peace with Israel or peace with Hamas, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said within two hours of the unity agreement's announcement. Abbas chose Hamas.

    The problem with Israel's objections is that the Palestinians have been very successful at selling Prime Minister Salam Fayad's construction of Palestinian institutions and getting the world to agree to one key point: The Palestinians want to reform and only Israel stands in the way.

    However, with the assassination of Osama bin Laden, the Palestinians, in this case Hamas, shot themselves in the foot allowing Israel to claim, as its ambassadors have been told to do worldwide at every opportunity, that despite appearances, nothing's changed. Hamas could not have been more helpful to Israel.

    Ismail Haniya, Hamas leader in the Gaza strip, condemned America for assassinating bin Laden, calling him "a holy Arab warrior."

    Israel poured oil onto this fire by broadcasting a video on Israel’s channel 10 showing an imam in Jerusalem's al-Aqsa mosque eulogizing bin Laden. He told the worshippers: "The dogs of the West murdered one of the lions of Islam."

    The dogs would be America. The lion of Islam would be bin Laden. The speaker added about President Barack Obama: "You should know that you will soon swing from a rope."

    Assuming the video is genuine, and nobody so far has doubted it, there must be a lot of red faces in Ramallah. This is not the face of Palestine that Fatah leaders want the world to see.

    20 comments

    Palestinians have the right to control their owns destiny, unity government with parlimentary and presidential election israel doesn’t want unity government because it will lead to the establishment of Palestinian state and Palestinian identity

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, hamas, fatah, martin-fletcher
  • 18
    Feb
    2011
    9:18am, EST

    Where does the term 'Day of Rage' come from?

    Muhammed Muheisen / AP

    Yemeni anti-government demonstrators demand the resignation of President Ali Abdullah Saleh in Sanaa, Yemen on Friday.

    By Petra Cahill, News Editor, NBC News

    With protesters across the Middle East and North Africa calling for “Days of Rage,” it raises the question: Where does the term come from? What is the etymology of the phrase and when was it adopted by Arab protesters?

    The term appears to have been first used in the United States by the Weathermen, also known as the Weather Underground, a radical leftist, anti-government organization. The anti-Vietnam war organization planned several “days of rage” as an effort to “bring the war home.”  Beginning on Oct. 8, 1969, a few hundred protesters ran through the well-heeled streets of Chicago’s Gold Coast smashing everything from cars to fancy shop windows.  After four days of protests and repeated clashes with the police, 287 people were arrested. The Weathermen organization eventually petered out after the end of the Vietnam War.

    But then, the expression fell into disuse, according to a Google timeline of the terms usage. It only re-emerged in 1989 when a cultural kerfuffle erupted over the broadcasting of a PBS documentary called “Days of Rage: The Young Palestinians.” Produced by Jo Franklin, an award-winning producer for the MacNeil-Lehrer Report, the documentary was met with resistance because it told the story of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from the Palestinian perspective. it featured Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza denouncing their treatment by their Israeli occupiers and was made in the height of what became known as the First Intifada, or Palestinian uprising against the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories, from 1987-1993.

    PBS viewers, particularly those in New York, took issue with the documentary being broadcast on public TV because they said it was “pure propaganda” and did not provide balance by showing the Israeli perspective.  

    The documentary became a polarizing topic of debate, with the New York Times widely denouncing the project to the Los Angeles Times championing it as a fresh look at the conflict from voices seldom heard in the American media. Channel Thirteen, the New York PBS station lists the controversy among “Thirteen’s Most Shocking Moments.”

    After months of public debate, the documentary eventually aired to a huge audience, with the Israeli perspective edited in and a roundtable discussion held after the broadcast. It also aired across the Middle East – which is why Franklin believes the term became synonymous with protests in the Arab world to this day.

    Franklin said that the phrase was not a translation of an Arabic term she had heard on the street, but rather just an idea that came to her as she was editing the film. In Arabic, the term is يوم الغضب , pronounced “youm al ghadab.”

    “I was just watching the footage day after day. You know how it is when you are editing a 90-minute film and all of a sudden it came to me – the core of the film was rage. Consequentially I named the film, ‘Days of Rage: The Young Palestinians,’” Franklin said during a recent phone interview.

    Reuters

    Anti-government protesters shout slogans during a demonstration in the southern Yemeni city of Taiz on Friday.

    She said that in the midst of the U.S. controversy, a friend at the Washington Post was traveling to Jordan and asked if he could show the film to the then King Hussein. She said that Hussein not only watched it, but he “put it on the satellite out of Jordan and broadcast it all over the Middle East!”

    While she essentially coined the term at the time, she’s still surprised to see it being used now. “It is just absolutely fascinating to me now, years later, to see that literally became ‘the term. ’” 

    First intifada? Second intifada?
    In fact, the term has become so widespread since then that a number of Middle East experts couldn’t pinpoint exactly when it was first used.

    Martin Fletcher, NBC News' longtime Middle East correspondent said that he couldn’t remember exactly when it came into common parlance, but believes it wasn’t until the 1990s.

    Lawrence Pintak, now dean of the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University, covered the Middle East as a correspondent for over 30 years beginning in the early 1980s and is the author of "The New Arab Journalist."

    Pintak, who started his career as a reporter in Beirut in the early 1980s and then moved on to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said he always assumed the term “day of rage” was an English translation of an Arab saying. 

    “I certainly remember it in the Second Intifada [2000-2005], but I don’t specifically remember if it was in the First Intifada or not. But it’s like the chicken and the egg. If Jo [Franklin] says she made it up, not because of what she heard on the ground, that’s very interesting.”

    Likewise, Steven Cook, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, said he couldn’t remember exactly when he first heard the term. “I have vague recollection of it being used during the First Intifada… I can’t be sure, but I have a vague recollection of that.”  

    However, when asked if Franklin’s documentary might have started the trend, he said, “that may actually be it.”

    Daoud Kuttab, a Palestinian journalist also started reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the early 1980s. “I would say it dates back to the Palestinian intifada. But I could not really answer you specifically when it actually started. Or what was the one occasion that actually got the name kind of tacked on to it,” Kuttab said.

    “I think it started in one place and they just picked it up. There is a lot of copy-catting here. As they say, ‘courage is contagious.’”    

    Regardless of where the term came from, Cook, from the CFR pointed out that the term is used because it fits the occasion. “I wouldn’t attach too much importance to it being used in one era – like the first intifada or the second intifada…and then it being used in Cairo for the first Friday of protests. It’s just an obvious thing that people who are rising up against their government might use.”

    And Kuttab pointed out that whatever  the “rage” implied in the term translates to, the Egyptians deserve credit for what they achieved – but mostly for keeping it non-violent.  He added, “As President Obama said, ‘their moral power was to keep it non-violent.’ You pay a price for that, but it’s so much more powerful.” 

    If you have any ideas about the origin of the term, please contribute via the comment section below.

    26 comments

    Like all the rest, every hateful, trouble-making, twisted stretch of the truth, comes from the media.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: egypt, middle-east, palestinians, israelis, day-of-rage, petra-cahill
  • 22
    Oct
    2010
    9:11am, EDT

    For Palestinian farmers, no peace during olive harvest

    Three generations of Palestinian farmers clash with Jewish settlers as they attempt to harvest their most important crop. NBC's Paul Goldman reports from the West Bank.

    2 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: palestinians, olives, israeli-settlers, paul-goldman
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • egypt,
  • china,
  • afghanistan,
  • libya,
  • world-news,
  • pakistan,
  • israel,
  • hosni-mubarak,
  • japan,
  • middle-east,
  • tsunami,
  • ed-flanagan,
  • richard-engel,
  • ian-williams,
  • japan-earthquake,
  • 2010,
  • adrienne-mong,
  • jim-maceda,
  • bo-gu,
  • charlene-gubash,
  • mubarak,
  • world-cup,
  • protests,
  • after-the-wave,
  • cairo,
  • miranda-leitsinger,
  • germany,
  • italy,
  • north-korea,
  • iran,
  • gadhafi,
  • thailand,
  • russia,
  • london,
  • u-s,
  • claudio-lavanga,
  • palestinians,
  • paul-goldman,
  • ayman-mohyeldin,
  • somalia,
  • britain,
  • syria,
  • protest,
  • andy-eckardt
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

World Blog

NBC News World Blog provides a dynamic look at world events and trends – both big and small – from NBC News correspondents, producers, and bureaus around the world. Online entries – from text to video – explore the latest news events and how they are shaping our world. Click here to read more about the journalists behind NBC News World Blog!

Follow us

Petra Cahill, News Editor, NBC News

Petra Cahill is a senior news editor for msnbc.com who works with NBC News correspondents across the globe to develop unique stories for the web site.

Petra Cahill, News Editor, NBC News Blogroll

  • New Yorker's Letter from China
  • WSJ China Real Time Report
  • World Blog
  • Times topics: China

Archives

  • 2013
    • March (1)
    • February (1)
    • January (2)
  • 2012
    • December (2)
    • November (1)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • July (3)
    • May (6)
    • April (28)
    • March (40)
    • February (33)
    • January (44)
  • 2011
    • December (41)
    • November (51)
    • October (37)
    • September (39)
    • August (46)
    • July (35)
    • June (33)
    • May (31)
    • April (16)
    • March (46)
    • February (159)
    • January (42)
  • 2010
    • December (16)
    • November (20)
    • October (19)
    • September (23)
    • August (33)
    • July (28)
    • June (36)
    • May (26)
    • April (37)
    • March (30)
    • February (44)
    • January (29)
  • 2009
    • December (21)
    • November (19)
    • October (24)
    • September (23)
    • August (15)
    • July (27)
    • June (32)
    • May (24)
    • April (30)
    • March (24)
    • February (26)
    • January (35)
  • 2008
    • December (25)
    • November (31)
    • October (27)
    • September (17)
    • August (22)
    • July (21)
    • June (29)
    • May (30)
    • April (27)
    • March (26)
    • February (27)
    • January (28)
  • 2007
    • December (18)
    • November (28)
    • October (25)
    • September (32)
    • August (32)
    • July (25)
    • June (32)
    • May (24)
    • April (21)
    • March (29)
    • February (21)
    • January (28)

Most Commented

    Other blogs

    • Daily Nightly
    • The Maddow Blog
    • The Last Word
    • Hardblogger
    • First Read
    • World Blog
    • Field Notes
    • Inside Dateline
    • Behind the Wall
    • The Ed Show
    • Morning Joe
    • Daily Rundown

    NBCNews.com top stories

    3147,10
    © 2013 NBCNews.com
    • World news on NBCNews.com
    • About us
    • Contact
    • Help
    • Site map
    • Careers
    • Closed captioning
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy policy
    • Advertise