Identity, not policy, driving the new Egypt

Amr Nabil / AP

Egyptian representatives of candidates and army soldiers guard ballot boxes on a vehicle as anti-riot policemen line up in front of supporters outside a counting center in Giza, Egypt on Thursday.

DOKKI, EGYPT – Mona Al Shabrawy came into her daughter’s room and eagerly woke her up Wednesday morning. The gynecologist was getting ready to go vote in the second round of Egypt’s parliamentary elections, but there was one problem: She didn’t know who to vote for; her instinct was to turn to her daughter, Aisha, for advice.

Aisha Al Shabrawy has been closely following the evolving political landscape in post-revolution Egypt. Party pamphlets and candidate manifestos litter the family home. Aisha took to the streets during Egypt’s revolution in February of year, and since then, she has been to many other protests in Tahrir Square.


She has her finger on the pulse on the debate raging across Egypt over the role of religion in politics, which grew more intense after the first round of elections that saw Islamist parties decimate their liberal counterparts and win close to 60 percent of the seats. Aisha didn’t hold back when suggesting to her mother how she should make her choice.

“I told her to vote for the Kotla,” Aisha said. “Kotla” is the Arabic word for “Bloc” – it is short form among Egyptians these days referring to the liberal leaning bloc of political parties running together.

A few hours later, Aisha cast her own ballot at a polling station in Agouza, a town just outside Cairo, for the first time in her life. The second round of parliamentary elections were held Wednesday and Thursday in nine out of Egypt’s 27 provinces.  She voted for the liberals at a women-only polling station.

It was the culmination of a personal journey for this 31-year-old aspiring jewelry designer that highlights how identity is shaping Egypt’s new political landscape more so than policy. And at a time when results from Egypt’s first round of elections suggest the country as a whole is shifting toward conservative Islamist parties, Aisha is moving in the opposite direction.

Story of an ex-Islamist
At the age of 18, Aisha noticed she was increasingly at odds with what she considered to be the materialistic and superficial society around her. Aisha began to find comfort and solace among her more religious friends and ultimately was drawn to the appeal of Islamic preachers like Amr Khaled, who like many other Muslim preachers has amassed a huge online and public following.

Amr Nabil / AP

Egyptian women read a candidates list at a polling center in Giza, Egypt on Thursday.

She began attending religious lessons and meetings that were geared toward the young. “They knew about the young generation, they were very practical and pragmatic in appealing to the youth,” she said.

By the age of 21, Aisha had embraced the ultra-conservative teachings of the Salafi movement. Many Salafis say their “interpretation of Islam is the correct interpretation.” They believe in “the righteous ancestors” of Islam, or as known in Arabic, the “Salaf el Salah.”

For the next two years, she was a self-described Salafist, a pious individual who loved wearing the Niqab – or full-face veil. She appreciated the sense of community enjoyed by Salafists and their straightforwardness about their beliefs and viewpoints.

But Aisha also began to see rigidity in how Salafis practiced their religion. She felt the Salafis were putting too much of an emphasis on the external image and behavior that should be projected by its followers, rather than on the spiritual journey inside. They would use guilt and fear to persuade or dissuade their followers from certain actions. It was all beginning to take its toll on how Aisha viewed herself.

Nearly five years after beginning to embrace Salafist ideology and practices, she began to withdraw from the movement and its associations, opting instead to focus on her own spiritual journey. In 2003, she stopped wearing the niqab and today considers herself liberal.

Related link: Accusations fly in second round of Egypt vote

Explosion of political parties
With the fall of the Mubarak regime and the explosion of political parties, Aisha is figuring out where she fits into the political scene. Many Egyptians expected the emergence of Islamist parties after Mubarak’s ouster. In this conservative society that is often considered the birthplace of political Islamist movements in other parts of the world, Egyptians had grown accustomed to the presence of socio-religious political organizations.

One movement for close to 80 years has dominated political Islam in Egypt: the Muslim Brotherhood. And after the first round of parliamentary voting two weeks ago, its political wing, known as the Freedom and Justice Party, ascended to the top of the political ladder.

But the election result that surprised many Egyptians was the strong performance of the even-more-conservative parties known as Salafists. These parties managed to garner close to a quarter of the seats in the first round, which took place in the country’s more urban areas, like Cairo.

Now, as the voting moves into more rural areas with lower incomes, Salafist (and other Islamist) parties are expected to do just as well, if not better. In poor areas across Egypt, the state for years has failed to provide adequate social services like hospitals, clinics, schools and jobs. These shortcomings were often filled by socio-religious organizations through charitable work.

These very same charitable organizations are now part of larger political movements and are reaping the political benefits of years of service to the previously neglected masses.

Identity politics
At a polling station in Giza, one woman gave her take on Egypt’s elections. “We are not voting based on policies and solutions to our problems. I don’t think any of these candidates actually have solutions to our daily problems. I don’t know who any of them are, to be honest, but I know what they represent.”

In that sense, many believe Egypt’s elections are as much about identity as they are about politics.

“This vote should not be called elections, these elections should be called a census,” said Mohsen, a 42-year-old computer engineer, walking out of a polling station after voting in Dokki,  a town in Giza governorate just outside of Cairo. “Based on the results we will know the religious and political orientation of our society, not the policies we need,” he added.

The notion that many Egyptians are voting based on their identity in elections, which so far have been considered mostly free and fair, after decades of rigged elections and politics dominated by single party rule, may not be a surprise to many Egyptians. But some voters are concerned about what effect identity politics could have on future policies.

Omar Hikal, a businessman also voting in Dokki, was a first-timer at the polls. “I don’t believe religion should be the basis for political decisions.”

And that’s what has many liberals concerned about the first round of voting. “Egypt is not an Islamic country, it should be a Muslim country,” Hikal said. Liberals like Hikal don’t want Egypt’s largely Muslim identity to become the basis for an Islamic state.

The country’s military rulers have already suggested that the body drafting the constitution has to reflect Egyptian diversity, something that angered Islamist parties and raised worries about a looming political confrontation between an Islamist-dominated parliament and the generals.

While the Freedom and Justice Party has tried to allay fears by assuring the public that social restrictions do not top the party’s legislative agenda, not everyone is convinced.

Aisha, the one-time Salafist turned liberal, said, “the Muslim Brotherhood may not be lying, but they don’t always say the whole truth.”

To some, like Aisha and Hikal, both liberal voters, at least the Salafists are “straight shooters.”
“If they want women to stay at home and wear veils, they will tell everyone that’s what we want to do,” said Hikal.
Others don’t see it that way.

“We had the liberals like Mubarak and his children for 30 years and look what he did to the country,” said Mohammed, a 47-year-old barber who voted for the Salafist Nour Party.

Associating liberals with the era of Mubarak’s rule is a common sentiment among many conservatives who believe the pro-American and pro-Israeli leader was emblematic of liberal ideology of trying to keep religion and religious parties marginalized from politics by force.

Extremist or an inspiration?
For Aisha, the sudden emergence of Salafist parties is not a surprise. But their transformation into a political movement is new and will be tested in an expanding political environment. 

Today, Aisha believes Salafis and other parties have a place in the new Egypt, so long as they don’t force their ideology onto others, something she warns Salafists do subtly well.

Since leaving behind Salafist ideology, Aisha has been contemplating turning her personal diary into a book.

A few weeks before the elections, she posted on her Facebook page what she thought would be a fitting title for her story, “Diaries of an Ex-extremist.” A few hours later, one of her Salafi friends replied… “You were never an extremist, you were an inspiration.”

Discuss this post

I have pro-revolution friends in Egypt who have to live with this situation everyday of their lives. It is very demanding and difficult for many different reasons. These people do not need, nor are they obliged, to entertain my opinions. But they sometimes ask for them and this is what I say:
In a social situation of upheaval which contains the real possibilities of violence and long-term harm, the most irresponsible thing one can do is to blindly and belligerently insist on the immediate implementation of one's own agenda. I am not referring solely to the protesters who are in reality no more thusly insistent than anyone else in this situation, it only appears that way to a superficial and uninformed perspective. No, this applies to everyone involved, including the Army and the Islamists and the uneducated and uniformed/misinformed mass of low-income citizens. I am also not saying that everyone involved necessarily has some significant truth and justice in their agenda. There may well be deeply corrupted agendas. What I am saying is that human beings exist in a wide range of development and awareness and understanding. And all humans have an immediate impulse to be self-centered. The important thing is to attempt to understand oneself first and to approach human beings as they actually are, as far as one can actually determine this, and to be open to new possibilties one did not see before. I personally support the liberal revolution in Egypt and I will, whenever I am asked, do whatever I can to help it succeed, but I do not underestimate the power and determination and REALITY of the counter-revolution and anti-liberal forces. The goal is not chaos and violence though those terrible things will at times emerge because the situation is what it is and humans are what they are. But humans are also capable of growth and change and that is the goal. A situation must be created where this potential has the greatest chance of success. This means that the primary focus is on radical/roots development and not on impossible immediate transformation, impossible because even the revolutionaries don't know exactly what it should look like. Everyone is in a learning process. But what cannot be accepted is a refusal to grow and chnage. The crucial question is what the best way to overcome such refusal is. This is the revolutionary challenge standing before everyone.

I am not a Christian, or a Jew, or a Muslim, or an atheist, or a capitalist, or a socialist, any other sort of hard-system thinker. I am a human consciousness eager to grow and learn from experience.

Long-live the Human Revolution!

    Reply#1 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:50 PM EST

    the uneducated Muslims just voting for Islam, victory Islam, the evil Muslim brotherhood and the more evil salfeen(saudi belief) are using every bad trick to win the election and the main trick, we victory Islam vote for us, i eally wish the big countries get involve and demand to put the Constitution first to for human rights and Christians minority in Egypt before it is too late, Mr president Obama after the army live fire and tank killed peaceful protesting Christians in Egypt told the the Christian to restrains themselves, unbelievable , i do not believe a president fighting for equal gays is saying that.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:16 PM EST

    The problem in Egypt is that the young, Facebook generation cleared the way for the well organized, Islamist, Muslim Brotherhood machine. The Islamists are taking over in a clever and efficient manner, and the young revolutionaries won't know what hit them What the young people thought would be a liberal, free, modern society will turn out to be a corrupt, Islamist, violent, restrictive society. Women and minorities will have no rights.

      Reply#3 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:12 PM EST

      I lived in Iran from 1976 until February 1979 (right through the build-up to the revolution until it was over).

      Pretty much everyone who was not part of the Shah's clique hated him and desperately wanted to oust him - ranging from students, moderates, intellectuals, merchants in the bazaar, middle class business people and employees, even the Tudeh (communist) party - all were resolved to see the last of the tyrant and the evil machinery that had kept him in power (the military, the police and Savak).

      It was probably one of the most bloodless revolutions in history. But, like Egypt today, most of those never foresaw the evil power that would replace Pahlavi - it was not that the creation of an Islamic state was the problem - it was the creation of a militant, belligerant, malignant, fundamentalist society - replacing the prior autocracy with a theocracy that was even worse - the freedoms people fought and died for have been denied them and a "pariah" state has been created that is abhorred by all and that, in the long term, threatens every element of stability in the Middle East.

      Vote carefully Egypt. May your God guide your hands into a peaceful path.

      Eamonn, Dublin, Ireland

      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:12 PM EST

      Dictators don't like religions which guide and strengthen people. Religious dictation doesn't like freedom which rob them of power as well. Vote liberal Egypt, you can always change it later, the other way around might not be possible. That Aisha girl seems like a smart cookie to me.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:01 AM EST

      I believe the Egyptian people have jumped the gun. the first order of business should have been their constitution, and the constitution should represent all Egyptians, The Islamist groups saw to it that this would not be the case when they started pushing the change over and calling for elections, the Army saw this coming but the extremists rallied the people and that threatened more violence. the chance for Egypt to form a true and fair Government is lost, what they will get is a Government that will serve only a part of the people. that has always been a problem in the ME. the people were impatient and now they will pay the price. some will be happy others discontent and as far as Egypt's ability to function with the rest of the free world, look at Iran. a government built on a religious sect can not represent all its people only that sect which is in control. the people just handed their dream of freedom over to religious zeolites. Religion does not belong in Power, it can not function in world affairs. How can Islam represent Christianity, Judaism or atheism when it cant even represent all of Islam. Egypt made a terrible mistake, and so are the rest of the Arab spring countries. there is no freedom where there is no choice.

        Reply#6 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:18 PM EST
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.